Don't overuse $(this)
If you're going to access the $(this) a lot, you might want to consider storing it into a local variable. So instead of something like this:
$('.items').each(function() {
var pos = $(this).offset();
var prevFloat = $(this).css('float');
var prevZIndex = $(this).css('z-index');
$(this).fadeOut();
...
You might want to consider changing your code to something more like this
$('.items').each(function() {
var $this = $(this),
pos = $this.offset(),
prevFloat = $this.css('float'),
prevZIndex = $this.css('z-index');
$this.fadeOut();
...
This will increase performance speed so you don't need to repeatedly create new jQuery objects
And as brombomb mentioned using $ infront of the variable name denotes that it's already a jQuery object
Written by Mark Vaughn
Related protips
14 Responses
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98b8c/98b8c883ea0cc7902ce3732e2920636e534e95e4" alt=""
I've done this for years. Why haven't I come up with the idea of writing this protip?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc6cd/fc6cd8cd781a527be121e0b62066ab62cc25e041" alt=""
@hannesg I didn't even check if someone else previously posted it, I just keep running into this on open source projects, I was thinking it was worth mentioning again
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba3fc/ba3fc6df1bf89edb0172907a836653e7e12d404e" alt=""
Great tip, but it can very well apply to all look-ups. If you're repeating the same selector on every line, just cache it on a variable and reuse the object returned the first time.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09294/0929494e6712a3423518a849db7980e94735865b" alt=""
Also don't overuse var keyword ;)
var $this = $(this),
pos = $this.offset(),
prevFloat = $this.css('float'),
prevZIndex = $this.css('z-index');
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc6cd/fc6cd8cd781a527be121e0b62066ab62cc25e041" alt=""
@idered hehe, true, I copy pasted this code directly from a jQuery plugin to make my point.
Also worth noting the idea of adding the $ to this to denote it is already a jquery object.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85b9d/85b9de9144c9e337eb8ccab89d80467cee5ae823" alt=""
I'd say this is a rather micro-optimization.
http://jsperf.com/jquery-this-caching
Don't overuse $(this)
, but do understand this
and what it scopes to when you do use it :)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c650d/c650df3fde42d01e2770c9aa0df9fd44fc279315" alt=""
boys you optimization is funny. read how real men optimize http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/gg622887.aspx
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/20f74/20f74d8d4a8037e42e8a100bde2310710f730471" alt=""
@leoj3n in JavaScript (unlike PHP) the $ sign is an ordinary symbol when used in a variable name, just like a letter or an underscore. It doesn’t change anything as far as the interpreter is concerned. For programmers, it can be a useful way to identify variables that hold jQuery objects, like @brombomb mentioned.
@francisc I think you're example test it too simple. Of course it's not going to matter in an example where there is only one element the DOM. When you use $(this)
it starts from the root node and then checks every node until it finds the given selector. In a real world scenario the lookups could become more expensive.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba904/ba904e17eee3c941358258b1cd6b8454b9d173ee" alt=""
This applies to everything that involves repetition. It's called the DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) principle.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bc9ea/bc9ea9a1757586342f8c0cd4600abfb9fac46d23" alt=""
measure things before you say what exactly optimised and how much it is
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f69c3/f69c34528c8eeb797e3eb34dbe8cbbac11c8f497" alt=""
@lublushokolad I like the 'real men' stuff!