Joined September 2012
·
Posted to
For is almost a lump of syntactic sugar in ruby!
over 1 year
ago
@richoh thank you again. I just updated it. Is there something wrong?
Posted to
For is almost a lump of syntactic sugar in ruby!
over 1 year
ago
@richoh It's ok now?
Posted to
For is almost a lump of syntactic sugar in ruby!
over 1 year
ago
@richoh I think I have known what your meaning is. I forget to mention the different between them. Thank your very much. I'll fix it ~
Posted to
For is almost a lump of syntactic sugar in ruby!
over 1 year
ago
@richoh . I don't want to mislead people. I just read the Loops part in the book <Programming Ruby>(1.9,3rd) at Page 162. It said that the only built-in Ruby looping primitives were while and until, foris almost a lump of syntactic sugar. And you can use for loop only if your class define a each method
Achievements
227 Karma
7,937 Total ProTip Views
Epidexipteryx
Have at least one original repo where C++ is the dominant language
Kona
Have at least one original repo where CoffeeScript is the dominant language
Komodo Dragon
Have at least one original repo where Java is the dominant language
Bear
Have at least one original repo where Objective-C is the dominant language
Altruist
Increase developer well-being by sharing at least 20 open source projects
Mongoose 3
Have at least three original repos where Ruby is the dominant language
Walrus
The walrus is no stranger to variety. Use at least 4 different languages throughout all your repos
Forked
Have a project valued enough to be forked by someone else
Charity
Fork and commit to someone's open source project in need
Mongoose
Have at least one original repo where Ruby is the dominant language
Cub
Have at least one original jQuery or Prototype open source repo
Thanks for
IronMan.prototype.constructor = IronMan; // fixing prototype pointer., which helps me a lot :)