You are totally right, thank you! I had to change the post a bit, in order to render the regex correctly… Again, thank you!
Exactly. And I must stress this good practice even farther with a little reading.
@odyniec, yes, that's a very good approach. However, I've had some cases where that approach is not enough. When you want a more descriptive scenario about what's wrong in the server-side, experience showed me this to be a good approach. But it's clearly a personal preference, I must stress.
@adevore3, fixed, thanks. :)
@hpoom, that's a great tip too! I'll definitely look into that, and update this protip. Thanks!
@stas, added! Thank you for the contribution. :)
What @fardjad said. Otherwise, Douglas Crockford will come out from the browser console and tear you apart!
Great tip, thank you!
I ended up creating a Codepen out of this, in order to keep it for later. All credit goes to you. Check it out here: http://codepen.io/gnclmorais/details/cHkqt
Awesome tip :D
Link's down.
@corysimmons, hard to manage. It’s just a common sense rule to keep the specificity of your selectors to a minimum.