4zz6ca
Last Updated: August 24, 2017
·
13.39K
· charly
3fbe81f6942a6edb382054b2491837f8

Scopes with Ransack

Combining Scopes & Ransack thanks to Virtus & Siphon

There's a common feature request on the ransack issue page and that's to integrate your usual ActiveRecord scopes within the search. Indeed ransack is a fantastic tool to quickly setup a form for selecting table rows depending on column values. But it falls a little short when you want more complex, relational searches. So you almost naturally add a scope in your ransack powered search form before you realize it doesn't work and there's no clear way to do it.

Ransack won't take it all

The problem with that attractive and somewhat obvious feature request is ransack relies on the typecasting activerecord performs on its attributes, to coerce all the string values of the parameter's hash into their real value. When params[:user][:age_gt] => "18" barges into your model it knows "18" should be an Integer (because the corresponding DB column says so) and will pursue accordingly.

On the flip side your model has no reason to know what's the argument's type you'd be sending to your scope.
Take this :

scope :active, ->(bool) { where(active: bool) } 

Unlike ActiveRecord attributes, it says nowhere that bool is a Boolean.

params[:user][:active] # => "false"
# and since "false" is just a string
!!"false" # => true 

Yeah.... Oups! Since you only get strings from your parameters you need a layer of configuration to tell what type your argument is before it reaches your scope.

Of course you could delegate the coercing work to each & every scope by having them only take strings. They would then turn the arguments into the right type. But that's not very elegant : first you run the risk of breaking legacy code and second you're adding another layer of responsability to activerecord which we're all trying to unbloat. Finally ransack is already being a Form object and an ActiveRecord extension, adding more responsability to it seems well.. irresponsible.

Why Siphon

Once you ransacked your database you may want to flee with your car but OMG it's out of gas and all the data's in it... So you pull out that little plastic tube out of your pocket and stick in another car suck out the first drops and then let it flow in your car... Siphoning is a very discrete activity next to ransacking and it shows in the codebase : the gist of it is around 50 lines.

So Siphon's just a tiny convenience gem similar to [has_scope] which is still experimental, but it does its job of applying scopes to an ActiveRecord model thanks to a Form Object (created with Virtus) containing the coercing info.

Now let's see it in action. Imagine you have the canonical "Orders, Products and Items" data set. What would be a case where ransack alone doesn't cover the conditions you want to apply ? Well I had to lookup ransack again because I couldn't remember where it fell short. It does cover quit complex conditions with 'OR', 'AND', matches, greater than, even joins etc. If course I could come up with complex queries to illustrate the necessity of a scope, but what would be the simplest situation in which ransack wouldn't cut it and you would need a custom scope. Well for one you can combine columns but you can't combine predicates (e.g equals and bigger than). So if you want to display all stale orders and need to disjoin 2 columns with different types:

With a scope it comes naturally (notice the 'OR'):

class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  scope :stale, -> { where(["state = 'onhold' OR  submitted_at < ?", 2.weeks.ago]) }
end

With ransack alone :

= search_form_for @q do |f|
  = f.text_field :description_or_name_cont  #=> Ok but...
  = f.text_field :state_eq_or_submitted_at_gt #=> Impossible.

... you're screwed!

And if you wish to put them in different fields and rely on the user to do the right combination

= search_form_for @q do |f|
  = f.text_field :state_eq 
  = f.date_field :submitted_at_gt

... you're still screwed because different fields only do exclusive conjunctions (aka: condition1 AND condition2) not disjunctions (aka: condition1 OR condition2).

Ok point made let's get on with applying scopes within a form.

Siphon in action

The Scopes :

# order.rb
class Order < ActiveRecord::Base
  scope :stale, ->(duration) { where(["state='onhold' OR (state != 'done' AND updated_at < ?)", duration.ago]) }
  scope :unpaid -> { where(paid: false) }
end

The Form :

= form_for @order_form do |f|
  = f.label :stale, "Stale since more than"
  = f.select :stale, [["1 week", 1.week], ["3 weeks", 3.weeks], ["3 months", 3.months]], include_blank: true
  = f.label :unpaid
  = f.check_box :unpaid

The Form Object:

# order_form.rb
class OrderForm
  include Virtus.model
  include ActiveModel::Model
  #
  # attribute are the named scopes and their value are : 
  # - either the value you pass a scope whith arguments
  # - either a Siphon::Nil value to apply (or not) on a scope whith no argument
  #
  attribute :stale, Integer
  attribute :unpaid, Siphon::Nil
end

Aaaaand... TADA siphon :

# orders_controller.rb
def search 
  @order_form = OrderForm.new(params[:order_form])
  @orders = siphon(Order.scoped).scope(@order_form)
end

You may want to read some insights on what siphon does or let's dive right into it...

Ransack hand in hand with Siphon & Virtus

The main idea is to separate the ransack fields from the siphon/scope fields and therefore nest one of them. So let's nest the ransack fields in the q param (since it's ransack's convention) and leave the scopes on top :

-# admin/products/index.html
= form_for @product_search, url: "/admin/products", method: 'GET' do |f|
  = f.label "has_orders"
  = f.select :has_orders, [true, false], include_blank: true
  -#
  -# And the ransack part is right here... 
  -#
  = f.fields_for @product_search.q, as: :q do |ransack|
    = ransack.select :category_id_eq, Category.grouped_options

ok so now params[:product_search] holds the scopes and params[:product_search][:q] has the ransack goodness. We need to find a way, now, to distribute that data to the form object. So first let ProductSearch swallow it up in the controller:

# products_controller.rb
def index
  @product_search = ProductSearch.new(params[:product_search])
  @products ||= @product_search.result.page(params[:page])
end

And now the gist of it :

# product_search.rb
class ProductSearch
  include Virtus.model
  include ActiveModel::Model

  # These are scopes for the siphon part
  attribute :has_orders,    Boolean
  attribute :sort_by,       String

  # The q attribute is holding the ransack object
  attr_accessor :q

  def initialize(params = {})
    @params = params || {}
    super
    @q = Product.search( @params.fetch("q") { Hash.new } )
  end

  # siphon takes self since its the formobject
  def siphoned
    Siphon::Base.new(Product.scoped).scope( self )
  end

  # and here we merge everything
  def result
    Product.scoped.merge(q.result).merge(siphoned)
  end
end

As you see here Virtus will handle all the siphon attributes automagically (thanks to super which really deserves its name here). Then the line :

@q = Product.search( @params.fetch("q") { Hash.new } )

...will assign a Ransack Form Object to q which will bravely hold the values in :

= f.fields_for @product_search.q, as: :q do |ransack|

Then calling @q.result on it will give you an ActiveRelation which you'll merge with the other ActiveRelation given by siphon :

Siphon::Base.new(Product.scoped).scope( self )

And voilà, the controller just collects all the fruits of the hardworking Form Object :

@products ||= @product_search.result.page(params[:page])

... and you can go on applying more scope (like pagination) it's still your good ol' regular ActiveRelation...


To quickly wrap it up : there's no magic and it just works!
Feel free to ask me questions or suggest stuff to improve the article
I'd be glad to update it.

Say Thanks
Respond

4 Responses
Add your response

14951
Ed77c0d1c8da409c4f69f67f934ff0bb

It seems to be a pretty nice solution for adding scopes to Ransack. I think its an elegant solution to that problem.

However I am wondering why you pass Order.all to the siphon method at this line:

@orders = siphon(Order.all).scope(@order_form)

When you call Order.all is it going execute the query ? How can you apply the scope on the array?

Should it be instead, something like this ?:
@orders = siphon(Order.scoped).scope(@order_form)

over 1 year ago ·
14968
3fbe81f6942a6edb382054b2491837f8

Absolutely it should only be a relation object, the inconsistency in this post comes from the changes in rails and me copy/pasting from real code : in version 4.0 #scoped is deprecated and becomes #all. In Rails 4.1 #scoped throws an error.
So yup : use #scoped only in rails < 4 and #all in >= 4.

over 1 year ago ·
14971
Ed77c0d1c8da409c4f69f67f934ff0bb

Thanks for the quick response, I didn't know about that Rails 4 change.

Thanks again for your gem it helped me a lot for migrating from a Rails 2 with searchlogic to a Rails 3 with Ransack.

over 1 year ago ·
29244

It seems the boolean typecasting problem was solved:
https://github.com/activerecord-hackery/ransack/pull/742

4 months ago ·